Armstrong store in Atlanta

 rec.crafts.glass    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
Armstrong store in Atlanta Michael 09-17-2007
Posted by Michael on September 17, 2007, 6:55 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I visited the Armstrong Outlet Store in Atlanta today. Never been
there before. It was a great experience. They sell to anybody,
including the hobbyist. It's separated into the front show room, with
about 100 types of glass illuminated from behind, and the back
warehouse, with hundreds of boxes well marked and easily accessed.
Each type has three slots from smaller to bigger. The area with the
full-sized sheets is normally off limits to customers. They gave me
rubber gloves to protect my hands when handling the glass, and a nice
catalog when I left. They had bunches of boxes of scrap on the floor
but I'm not much into that.

If you buy a full sheet, there is a good discount. Armstrong glass
that I found for $77 elsewhere was $37 there.

Michael


Posted by glassman on September 17, 2007, 7:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>I visited the Armstrong Outlet Store in Atlanta today. Never been
> there before. It was a great experience. They sell to anybody,
> including the hobbyist. It's separated into the front show room, with
> about 100 types of glass illuminated from behind, and the back
> warehouse, with hundreds of boxes well marked and easily accessed.
> Each type has three slots from smaller to bigger. The area with the
> full-sized sheets is normally off limits to customers. They gave me
> rubber gloves to protect my hands when handling the glass, and a nice
> catalog when I left. They had bunches of boxes of scrap on the floor
> but I'm not much into that.
>
> If you buy a full sheet, there is a good discount. Armstrong glass
> that I found for $77 elsewhere was $37 there.
>
> Michael
>


Not exactly supporting the 3 tier system is it? The only knock is that
the Chinese glass is mostly really ugly. It is getting better, but you
can't put 100's of hours into a Dragonfly and look to save $25 bucks using
cheap glass can you?


--
JK Sinrod
www.SinrodStudios.com
www.MyConeyIslandMemories.com



Posted by Michael on September 17, 2007, 8:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options
glassman wrote:

The only knock is that the Chinese glass is mostly really ugly. It is
getting better, but you can't put 100's of hours into a Dragonfly and
look to save $25 bucks using cheap glass can you?

***************
I thought most of the pieces I looked at were beautiful, but my
experience is very limited. The one thing I did notice is that most
of the opal glass was too transparent to suit my tastes for a lamp. I
want to look at the lamp, not the bulbs. My test was to be able to
see the shadow of my fingers on the other side of the glass with a
moderately lit backdrop, but not be able to make out the creases
between my finger joints. Does that sound about right? I made a list
of the glass I thought would work and I liked. It came to about 25
types.

Here in a few weeks I hope to travel up to Kokomo and check out their
selection.

And speaking of lamps, I'm going to start on the Worden Tulip as soon
as I get back home from Atlanta. It's going to be the guinea pig
before the Odyssey lamps. I've still got some vacation coming. I'm
thinking about taking three or four days and going for a big jumpstart
on it. This is a terrible thing to say, but I'm not going to be a
real stickler for quality on the first one. More than anything I just
want to run through the process and get a warm fuzzy for it. After
watching the Porcelli video, I know that I want to take the pattern
somewhere and get however many copies of the design it takes for the
entire thing before I cut it out and don't have anything to lay them
out on.

Michael


Posted by Javahut on September 17, 2007, 9:38 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> glassman wrote:
>
> The only knock is that the Chinese glass is mostly really ugly. It is
> getting better, but you can't put 100's of hours into a Dragonfly and
> look to save $25 bucks using cheap glass can you?
>
> ***************
> I thought most of the pieces I looked at were beautiful, but my
> experience is very limited. The one thing I did notice is that most
> of the opal glass was too transparent to suit my tastes for a lamp. I
> want to look at the lamp, not the bulbs. My test was to be able to
> see the shadow of my fingers on the other side of the glass with a
> moderately lit backdrop, but not be able to make out the creases
> between my finger joints. Does that sound about right? I made a list
> of the glass I thought would work and I liked. It came to about 25
> types.
>
> Here in a few weeks I hope to travel up to Kokomo and check out their
> selection.
>
> And speaking of lamps, I'm going to start on the Worden Tulip as soon
> as I get back home from Atlanta. It's going to be the guinea pig
> before the Odyssey lamps. I've still got some vacation coming. I'm
> thinking about taking three or four days and going for a big jumpstart
> on it. This is a terrible thing to say, but I'm not going to be a
> real stickler for quality on the first one. More than anything I just
> want to run through the process and get a warm fuzzy for it. After
> watching the Porcelli video, I know that I want to take the pattern
> somewhere and get however many copies of the design it takes for the
> entire thing before I cut it out and don't have anything to lay them
> out on.
>
> Michael


Michael,
be real careful, you could over organize yourself out of having fun.

Don't take everything on the Porcelli DVD , or anyone else's word, as being
the "end all be all" official word for how to build a lamp. Enjoy it, the
entire process. Use one or two patterns and stack the glass up, who cares?
no big deal, stack the repeats one on top of the next, so what??

and if you see a glass you like and it is not overly dense, use it anyway.

I have restored an awful lot of original Tiffany lamps and what the glass
did was block the glare from the bulbs, not the view of the bulbs them
selves. Don't hold much to that school of thought. I have made a great
many lamps where the bulb was obvious as hell, but there was no glare from
it because of the glass. and the best glass, by whatever manufacturer is
the one whose glass has a particular "fire" or glow when used in a lamp. I
have never worried about the shape of or seeing the light bulb, but I don't
want a glare from it attracting my eye.



Posted by Michael on September 19, 2007, 7:56 am
Please log in for more thread options
Javahut wrote:

Don't take everything on the Porcelli DVD , or anyone else's word, as
being
the "end all be all" official word for how to build a lamp. Enjoy it,
the
entire process. Use one or two patterns and stack the glass up, who
cares?
no big deal, stack the repeats one on top of the next, so what??

*****************
That is good advice. I see the Porcelli method as only one solid
method of doing the lamps. But it is the first complete beginning-to-
end process that I've seen.

So far I have seen three different methods for cutting the glass for a
lamp, cutting directly around the cut-out pattern piece (Porcelli),
drawing around the cut-out and then cutting, and cutting from a light
table. Right now I'm favoring Porcelli's method. Cutting from a
light table and drawing around the piece both seem to add extra chance
for error into the mix.

Michael






Similar ThreadsPosted
New Jersey stained glass store January 14, 2007, 7:11 pm
soldering stained glass with hardware store solder? April 18, 2007, 2:57 pm

The site map in XML format XML site map
Contact Us | Privacy Policy