On flaws

 alt.crafts.blacksmithing    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
On flaws Prometheus 04-14-2007
Posted by Prometheus on April 14, 2007, 10:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hello all,

This is from the woodturning group, but I feel it's appropriate to
blacksmiting as well.


>Hi Kevin,
>One peculiar thing I have learned since I started selling my work is
>that people seem intriqued by the "mistakes" or unexpected attributes
>that arrise when making a turned object.
>
>Since I have sold several pieces I considered junk because of
>imperpfections I either made or were inherent in the wood, I came to
>accept this as one of the unique features of that particular bowl and
>now never exclude one for availability.
>
>One thing that is often hard to avoid is heat cracks in the wall if
>you get the surface too hot, but people love this feature in a bowl.

Quite a while ago, I recall a person (and I cannot remember whom)
saying to me (paraphrased):

"It won't be long before everything is produced with such precision,
and made from things that have little direct connection with natural
materials, that people will long for the moments when they can leave
the office and just touch something made of wood."

That has stuck with me over the years, and I think it really rings
true. Beyond the concept of wood as a material (wood was just a handy
metaphor, of course), I would imagine (and I know it is true for
myself, at least) that people either conciously or subconciously are
beginning to reach that state. There is a lot of value in modern
production methods, and it is amazing what things can be made, and
made availible to the general public. But our stunning degree of
wealth in terms of manufactured goods comes with a human cost as well.

While I have a computer in front of me that contains billions of
microscopic transistors working in unison, I no longer see that as
unusual. Despite the amazing degree of sophistication in the
technology, and the sheer amount of raw genius that went into creating
it, it is so cheaply availible and commonplace, that the wonder of a
this thing that is unrivaled in human history is greatly diminished.
It was made by machines which can do no other thing, rarely make
mistakes, and have no inherant obsticles to overcome- machines
operated by individuals who most likely could not explain even a
fraction of the functions of that machine is actually performing.
There is nothing there to hold in awe, save the minds that initially
concieved and implemented them, and it is hard to capture that elusive
image and pause to give thanks for the giants who made a thing
possible.

On the other hand, a flawed object created by the hand of a living
human being says something enitrely different. It is the flaw itself
that directs the mind of the observer to wonder and disbelief. The
flaw reveals to us that the object is *not* the product of a
dispassionate automation which is capable of mindless repetition, but
rather an object which has been worked by a person who has had to
overcome many obsticles and endure many failures to learn how to bend
a material to their will. When they made the thing, they cared. Even
on a bad day, a craftsman or artisan does not try to produce shoddy
work- and even on a good day, a person who has no abilities or
interest in those areas cannot replicate even the meanest of items
made by those who have taken the time to learn what is needed to
create a thing.

It is that knowledge, whether it is stated explicitly or buried deep
in the psyche, that breeds a general fascination with flawed works. A
flawed work has a soul, and contains in every curve and plane a
reflection of the dedication and work of the person who created it.
It is the union of all those things which make us human crystalized,
and reconnects us to the hundreds of thousands of years in which our
species has struggled with mind, heart, and hands to bring us to our
present level of wealth and leisure. The flaw is history set in
material form- displaying a snapshot of the temporary limitations of,
and even more importantly, the promise of an ever-changing evolving
mind.

That's why your observation is not all that peculiar, at least in my
mind.

Posted by Kyle J. on April 15, 2007, 12:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options
I think this is especially true when the "art" object is particularly suited
to it's purpose. If it is made to do a job and does it better than the mass
produced junk from Walmart, then you have something truly unique and
ultimately more valuable. The flaws tell us this thing was hand made for a
reason from materials that are expected be around for a while. Have we all
noticed that most of the products these days are plastic and small bits of
metal and wood where required? There are folks selling "oak" furnishing
that is particle board wrapped in an oak veneer! I've got clamps on my
bench that are plasic with a spring and maybe a stiffening rod. I even like
them for what they are but part of what they are is disposable. I
appreciate old tools even more and will go out of my way and spend more
money for then.

GA

> Hello all,
>
> This is from the woodturning group, but I feel it's appropriate to
> blacksmiting as well.
>
>
>
> Quite a while ago, I recall a person (and I cannot remember whom)
> saying to me (paraphrased):
>
> "It won't be long before everything is produced with such precision,
> and made from things that have little direct connection with natural
> materials, that people will long for the moments when they can leave
> the office and just touch something made of wood."
>
> That has stuck with me over the years, and I think it really rings
> true. Beyond the concept of wood as a material (wood was just a handy
> metaphor, of course), I would imagine (and I know it is true for
> myself, at least) that people either conciously or subconciously are
> beginning to reach that state. There is a lot of value in modern
> production methods, and it is amazing what things can be made, and
> made availible to the general public. But our stunning degree of
> wealth in terms of manufactured goods comes with a human cost as well.
>
> While I have a computer in front of me that contains billions of
> microscopic transistors working in unison, I no longer see that as
> unusual. Despite the amazing degree of sophistication in the
> technology, and the sheer amount of raw genius that went into creating
> it, it is so cheaply availible and commonplace, that the wonder of a
> this thing that is unrivaled in human history is greatly diminished.
> It was made by machines which can do no other thing, rarely make
> mistakes, and have no inherant obsticles to overcome- machines
> operated by individuals who most likely could not explain even a
> fraction of the functions of that machine is actually performing.
> There is nothing there to hold in awe, save the minds that initially
> concieved and implemented them, and it is hard to capture that elusive
> image and pause to give thanks for the giants who made a thing
> possible.
>
> On the other hand, a flawed object created by the hand of a living
> human being says something enitrely different. It is the flaw itself
> that directs the mind of the observer to wonder and disbelief. The
> flaw reveals to us that the object is *not* the product of a
> dispassionate automation which is capable of mindless repetition, but
> rather an object which has been worked by a person who has had to
> overcome many obsticles and endure many failures to learn how to bend
> a material to their will. When they made the thing, they cared. Even
> on a bad day, a craftsman or artisan does not try to produce shoddy
> work- and even on a good day, a person who has no abilities or
> interest in those areas cannot replicate even the meanest of items
> made by those who have taken the time to learn what is needed to
> create a thing.
>
> It is that knowledge, whether it is stated explicitly or buried deep
> in the psyche, that breeds a general fascination with flawed works. A
> flawed work has a soul, and contains in every curve and plane a
> reflection of the dedication and work of the person who created it.
> It is the union of all those things which make us human crystalized,
> and reconnects us to the hundreds of thousands of years in which our
> species has struggled with mind, heart, and hands to bring us to our
> present level of wealth and leisure. The flaw is history set in
> material form- displaying a snapshot of the temporary limitations of,
> and even more importantly, the promise of an ever-changing evolving
> mind.
>
> That's why your observation is not all that peculiar, at least in my
> mind.



Posted by trahern on April 15, 2007, 1:26 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Hello all,
>
> This is from the woodturning group, but I feel it's appropriate to
> blacksmiting as well.
>
>
> >Hi Kevin,
> >One peculiar thing I have learned since I started selling my work is
> >that people seem intriqued by the "mistakes" or unexpected attributes
> >that arrise when making a turned object.
>
> >Since I have sold several pieces I considered junk because of
> >imperpfections I either made or were inherent in the wood, I came to
> >accept this as one of the unique features of that particular bowl and
> >now never exclude one for availability.
>
> >One thing that is often hard to avoid is heat cracks in the wall if
> >you get the surface too hot, but people love this feature in a bowl.
>
> Quite a while ago, I recall a person (and I cannot remember whom)
> saying to me (paraphrased):
>
> "It won't be long before everything is produced with such precision,
> and made from things that have little direct connection with natural
> materials, that people will long for the moments when they can leave
> the office and just touch something made of wood."
>
> That has stuck with me over the years, and I think it really rings
> true. Beyond the concept of wood as a material (wood was just a handy
> metaphor, of course), I would imagine (and I know it is true for
> myself, at least) that people either conciously or subconciously are
> beginning to reach that state. There is a lot of value in modern
> production methods, and it is amazing what things can be made, and
> made availible to the general public. But our stunning degree of
> wealth in terms of manufactured goods comes with a human cost as well.
>
> While I have a computer in front of me that contains billions of
> microscopic transistors working in unison, I no longer see that as
> unusual. Despite the amazing degree of sophistication in the
> technology, and the sheer amount of raw genius that went into creating
> it, it is so cheaply availible and commonplace, that the wonder of a
> this thing that is unrivaled in human history is greatly diminished.
> It was made by machines which can do no other thing, rarely make
> mistakes, and have no inherant obsticles to overcome- machines
> operated by individuals who most likely could not explain even a
> fraction of the functions of that machine is actually performing.
> There is nothing there to hold in awe, save the minds that initially
> concieved and implemented them, and it is hard to capture that elusive
> image and pause to give thanks for the giants who made a thing
> possible.
>
> On the other hand, a flawed object created by the hand of a living
> human being says something enitrely different. It is the flaw itself
> that directs the mind of the observer to wonder and disbelief. The
> flaw reveals to us that the object is *not* the product of a
> dispassionate automation which is capable of mindless repetition, but
> rather an object which has been worked by a person who has had to
> overcome many obsticles and endure many failures to learn how to bend
> a material to their will. When they made the thing, they cared. Even
> on a bad day, a craftsman or artisan does not try to produce shoddy
> work- and even on a good day, a person who has no abilities or
> interest in those areas cannot replicate even the meanest of items
> made by those who have taken the time to learn what is needed to
> create a thing.
>
> It is that knowledge, whether it is stated explicitly or buried deep
> in the psyche, that breeds a general fascination with flawed works. A
> flawed work has a soul, and contains in every curve and plane a
> reflection of the dedication and work of the person who created it.
> It is the union of all those things which make us human crystalized,
> and reconnects us to the hundreds of thousands of years in which our
> species has struggled with mind, heart, and hands to bring us to our
> present level of wealth and leisure. The flaw is history set in
> material form- displaying a snapshot of the temporary limitations of,
> and even more importantly, the promise of an ever-changing evolving
> mind.
>
> That's why your observation is not all that peculiar, at least in my
> mind.

Well I have found that when I am doing pieces for the general public
that they like hammer marks and slight irregularities as well. I can
take a flatter and iron out all the dings but most often I find myself
breaking the corners off of bar stock because that appeals to the
customer more than a piece that looks like it was made in a machine
shop.



The site map in XML format XML site map
Contact Us | Privacy Policy