differential quench vs differential temper

 alt.crafts.blacksmithing    Post an article   get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content
Subject Author Date
differential quench vs differential temper r payne 03-09-2006
Posted by r payne on March 9, 2006, 2:16 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Yes I've had and excess of time to think lately, but it spent all
morning raining so I should be able to fire up my forge soon.

Anyway, I went from thinking on torsion and charpy to wondering about
the differences in differential quenching and differential tempering and
this led obviously to which results in a tougher knife all else being
equal?

As I understand it, differential quenching, either clay-coat or edge
quench, will give a hard martenistic edge with a soft perlite spine. (I
suppose the spine may be some combination of perlite/martensite and
perhaps with a little bainite). A differential temper on the other hand
will still have the hard martensite edge with a softened marteniste
spine.

So if someone was chasing that elusive ideal knife, which would be a
better choice and if you can why?

Ron


Posted by Del Cecchi on March 9, 2006, 4:07 pm
Please log in for more thread options
r payne wrote:
> Yes I've had and excess of time to think lately, but it spent all
> morning raining so I should be able to fire up my forge soon.
>
> Anyway, I went from thinking on torsion and charpy to wondering about
> the differences in differential quenching and differential tempering and
> this led obviously to which results in a tougher knife all else being
> equal?
>
> As I understand it, differential quenching, either clay-coat or edge
> quench, will give a hard martenistic edge with a soft perlite spine. (I
> suppose the spine may be some combination of perlite/martensite and
> perhaps with a little bainite). A differential temper on the other hand
> will still have the hard martensite edge with a softened marteniste
> spine.
>
> So if someone was chasing that elusive ideal knife, which would be a
> better choice and if you can why?
>
> Ron
>
Chef knife, fillet knife, bowie knife, marine corp survival knife, brush
cutting knife, corn shocking knife? Which are you trying to make?
Ideality is a function of requirements.

--
Del Cecchi
"This post is my own and doesn’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions,
strategies or opinions.”

Posted by on March 9, 2006, 7:28 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> ...wondering about the differences in differential quenching
> and differential tempering and...

[partial austenitizing too? ;]

BTDT by accident one time :) the thin part was ready to quench
and the thick back wasn't, but was real close so went for it and
quenched it anyway.

That knife couldn't be broken if you wanted to. It bent back and
forth like steel shipment strapping ("tie banding" -RR lingo;) but
the edge cracked right away since it was "dead hard" (untempered).

> ...which results in a tougher knife all else being equal?

I sure as heck don't know. :(

> As I understand it, differential quenching, either clay-coat or
> edge quench, will give a hard martenistic edge with a soft perlite
> spine. (I suppose the spine may be some combination of
> perlite/martensite and perhaps with a little bainite). A
> differential temper on the other hand will still have the hard
> martensite edge with a softened marteniste spine.

That all sounds right to me. :)

> So if someone was chasing that elusive ideal knife, which would
> be a better choice and if you can why?
> Ron

Cool question. :)

Alvin in AZ

Posted by Greyangel on March 10, 2006, 8:04 am
Please log in for more thread options
>> ...wondering about the differences in differential quenching
>> and differential tempering and...
>
> [partial austenitizing too? ;]
>
> BTDT by accident one time :) the thin part was ready to quench
> and the thick back wasn't, but was real close so went for it and
> quenched it anyway.
>
> That knife couldn't be broken if you wanted to. It bent back and
> forth like steel shipment strapping ("tie banding" -RR lingo;) but
> the edge cracked right away since it was "dead hard" (untempered).

Once properly tempered though it should have been an outstanding blade don't
you think?

>
>> ...which results in a tougher knife all else being equal?
>
> I sure as heck don't know. :(
>
>> As I understand it, differential quenching, either clay-coat or
>> edge quench, will give a hard martenistic edge with a soft perlite
>> spine. (I suppose the spine may be some combination of
>> perlite/martensite and perhaps with a little bainite). A
>> differential temper on the other hand will still have the hard
>> martensite edge with a softened marteniste spine.
>
> That all sounds right to me. :)
>
>> So if someone was chasing that elusive ideal knife, which would
>> be a better choice and if you can why?
>> Ron
>
> Cool question. :)
> Alvin in AZ

So let's review a couple of things. Tempering over a metal's ideal
temperture - say over 400F and up to 800F I've been hearing all kinds of
information lately that says you loose grain cohesion and strength. On the
other hand, if the steel has a good grain structure to begin with and you
never actually harden it in the quench, it gets left out of the temper
equation to a large degree. So you have a hard tempered edge and a dead soft
backing... or maybe a slightly hardened backing (I would think this would be
better). Seems to me this would be ideal. Of course the best bet is to do
the same knife both ways and beat the hell out of them to see :-).
Then there is also pulling the knife out of the quench while it is still
around 700F. I did this to a sword blade that once cool was plenty hard. I
could'nt find a local shop that would hardness test it for me but the blade
had a nice springy feel to it after temper. Too subjective for this
discussion really but it's an idea to play around with.

GA



Posted by on March 11, 2006, 11:25 am
Please log in for more thread options
> >> ...wondering about the differences in differential quenching
> >> and differential tempering and... [partial austenitizing too?;]
> > BTDT by accident one time :) the thin part was ready to quench
> > and the thick back wasn't, but was real close so went for it and
> > quenched it anyway.
> > That knife couldn't be broken if you wanted to. It bent back and
> > forth like steel shipment strapping ("tie banding" -RR lingo;) but
> > the edge cracked right away since it was "dead hard" (untempered).

> Once properly tempered though it should have been an outstanding
> blade don't you think?

Like Chas sez, "yes for certain uses, but not for others".

So far, I haven't found a need for other than an all-hard knife.

> >> ...which results in a tougher knife all else being equal?
> > I sure as heck don't know. :(
> >> As I understand it, differential quenching, either clay-coat or
> >> edge quench, will give a hard martenistic edge with a soft perlite
> >> spine. (I suppose the spine may be some combination of
> >> perlite/martensite and perhaps with a little bainite). A
> >> differential temper on the other hand will still have the hard
> >> martensite edge with a softened marteniste spine.
> > That all sounds right to me. :)
> >> So if someone was chasing that elusive ideal knife, which would
> >> be a better choice and if you can why?
> >> Ron
> > Cool question. :)

> So let's review a couple of things. Tempering over a metal's
> ideal temperture - say over 400F and up to 800F I've been hearing
> all kinds of information lately that says you loose grain cohesion
> and strength.

Yeah, "temper embrittlement". :)

> On the other hand, if the steel has a good grain structure to
> begin with and you never actually harden it in the quench, it
> gets left out of the temper equation to a large degree.

Yes, since it'll remain pearlite.
That's what my blade did. (above)

> So you have a hard tempered edge and a dead soft backing... or
> maybe a slightly hardened backing (I would think this would be
> better). Seems to me this would be ideal. Of course the best bet
> is to do the same knife both ways and beat the hell out of them to
> see :-).

At least it'd be ideal to pass some sort of artificial "knife guild
type" test. ;) Or survive Cliff. ;)

> Then there is also pulling the knife out of the quench while it is
> still around 700F. I did this to a sword blade that once cool was
> plenty hard. I could'nt find a local shop that would hardness
> test it for me but the blade had a nice springy feel to it after
> temper. Too subjective for this discussion really but it's an
> idea to play around with.
> GA

Yeah, that sucker prob'ly still became mostly martensite anyway,
just the same if it hadn't been pulled from the quench. (as long
as you got it under that "nose";)

I tend to do my butcher knives that way too. They usually need some
sort of "warp straightening" operation :/ and that's a good time to
do it since the martensite isn't fully formed. :)

Alvin in AZ

Similar ThreadsPosted
differential temper and full hard 1095 July 23, 2006, 8:17 pm
Differential hardening September 13, 2008, 10:25 am
differential tempered EUROPEAN swords September 8, 2008, 9:35 am
OT. Global warming - was differential tempererd.... September 19, 2008, 4:22 am
Quench oil what is best? January 22, 2007, 9:04 pm
Quench oil question March 13, 2006, 9:43 am
Disadvantage of using brine to quench April 17, 2006, 9:39 pm
Disadvantage of using brine to quench April 17, 2006, 9:39 pm
Tempering quench recipe September 12, 2007, 1:18 am
Quench oil & tempering power hammer dies January 24, 2007, 7:36 am

The site map in XML format XML site map
Contact Us | Privacy Policy